 |
| A protester at Lucknow’s Ghanta Ghar. Photo courtesy: Aisha Khatoon |
The first and the foremost point to remember here is that these two concepts (if I can say that) should be understood in the light of BJP’s Hindutva agenda, not to be confused with Hinduism, which is the third-largest religion in the world (according to Wikipedia) and is a dharma way of life. The former is a right-wing radical ideology and has little to do with religion.
Hindutva, the term popularised by Vinayak Damodar Savarkar in 1923, is a right-wing ideology. It is based on the beliefs that the entire Indian subcontinent is the homeland of the Hindus, or their matribhumi (motherland) and punyabhumi (holy land). (Wikipedia)
Now coming to Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizen (NRC).
NRC was recently carried out in Assam to drive out the illegal immigrants, who may have crossed over from Bangladesh. Apparently, the BJP was under the impression that all the immigrants were Muslims, so to promote their agenda of ‘Hindu Rashtra’, this was but the obvious thing for them to do. However, the result of the NRC wasn’t what they had expected.
The final NRC (National Register of Citizens) list was released on August 31 and an estimated 19-lakh people were excluded from it. Of these some 7-lakh were Muslims.
Now, those, who are unable to furnish proof of their citizenship, would be sent to detention centres. In Assam, the government insisted on showing pre-1971 genealogy proofs (like names in the then electoral rolls, etc.).
However, on December 21, the PIB released 13 FAQs to clear the confusion with regards to the NRC, which stated that the genealogy proofs were only required for Assam, based on the ‘Assam Accord’ and as per the directive of the Supreme Court. The same may not be required in other parts of India, whenever the NRC is carried out. Apparently, the same would be carried out along with the next Census (to be understood as National Population Register or NPR).
Going back to the Assam exercise, the government hadn’t expected that as many as 13 lakh Hindus would be excluded from the NRC rolls in Assam. So, in a bid to accommodate them, the Centre passed the CAA or the Citizenship Amendment Act. As a friend says, paving way for a ‘backdoor entry’.
Now, the question – why is there so much hoopla over it? It is because of the very nature of the Act. It distinguishes or divides people according to their religious beliefs as the CAA considers individuals of all religions except Muslims, much according to the Hindutva ideology. In other words, it’s a separatist doctrine. Via the CAA, Hindus and other religious migrants, except Muslims, from Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh can avail Indian citizenship.
This even though the Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) chief Mohan Bhagwat has time and again implied that the 130-crore (1.3 billion) people of India are ‘Hindus’.
“By saying that all are Hindus, we do not want to change anyone's religion, language or caste... We do not want any power centre other than the Constitution because we believe in it. Hindutva is a holistic approach and we believe that the ancestors of all were Hindus. This is unity in diversity and is marked by emotional integrity,” Bhagwat was quoted as saying at a recent public gathering in UP's Bareilly city.
Not to forget that the layman is yet to figure out what the CAA, NRC or NPR are about and the confusion regarding it is so much that is leaves room for doubt. Besides, the police atrocities, especially on students, is astounding. And all this they are doing in the name of religion.
Also, why is the government keen on spending close to Rs 55,000 crores on this futile exercise when bodies like the Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner are already present. Not to forget, it is part of the Ministry of Home Affairs, of which Amit Shah is the Minister. Then things like Aadhar Card, PAN cards, voter ID cards et el are already in use. Question is – how many cards does an Indian citizen need to showcase his citizenship?
Clearly, this is an exercise to get everyone’s mind off the core and pressing matters of the economic kind.
Not to forget the most pertinent question –
Was there no provision for granting citizenship to immigrants earlier?
An abridged version of this article was published on December 22 on my LinkedIn page.
© Urban Naxal